Subject	Ya it just seems like it would be very rare both MAFs would
Posted by	treese88 on August 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM
	This message has been viewed 212 times.
In Reply To	Its more common to make them rich, but ive seen them fail posted by sandmanz32 on August 14, 2011 at 05:07 PM
Message	fail in the same uncommon way. I was unable to turn up anything on no-load MAF voltages outside of idle through search either. Doesn't the MAF voltage change when k-value is played with because that could be a factor in the low reading? Though I doubt it would cause this large a discrepancy. Either way the MAF sensor is more fun to consider than fuel...I'm sick of fuel. I guess I'll keep searching and maybe get lucky! Thanks for posting up. '91 TT
Follow Ups	Fuel pressure follow-up and another question: - treese88 13:14:32 08/14/11 monitor you mafs voltage with the car at idle, and 2500 - sandmanz32 15:34:20 08/14/11 You may get an award..just tested MAF voltage via Nistune - treese88 16:21:21 08/14/11 Almost the same voltage reading. 1.155v at idle and - treese88 16:45:23 08/14/11 Its more common to make them rich, but ive seen them fail - sandmanz32 17:07:04 08/14/11 Ya it just seems like it would be very rare both MAFs would - treese88 19:24:59 08/14/11 More load would yield a higher voltage. I wouldnt begin - sandmanz32 11:01:46 08/15/11 K value will not change MAF voltage..... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 12:08:23 08/16/11 Those voltages are in line with what is normal for a single - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 11:57:40 08/16/11 The voltages your suggesting are a little crazy...... - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 11:53:00 08/16/11 Re: Fuel pressure follow-up and another question: - Greg D. (Specialty-Z) 11:30:54 08/16/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.